August 2008
G Powell/A E Hansen
Powell Webber & Associates
Solicitors, Auckland
Background
- To date South Kaipara claims brought by the named claimants on behalf of the five Marae
- In 2007 recognised need for an entity to be established to enable South Kaipara:
- To conduct negotiations
- To receive settlement assets
- To investigate possible commercial opportunities
- To reconfirm mandate to act on behalf of South Kaipara claimants
- Terms of Negotiations with Crown require establishment of post-settlement governance entity by February 2009
Steps Undertaken to Date
- Between June and August 2007 Claim Komiti undertook initial consultation on governance entity issues
- Feedback sought from OTS
- Claimant Feedback incorporated into developed proposal
What is the Process?
- Claim Komiti developed Governance Entity Discussion Booklet
- Presently consulting with Ngati Whatua o Kaipara
- After feedback will finalise proposal and put to Ngati Whatua o Kaipara for ratification
- If ratified will set up Governance Entity
Purpose of Consultation Hui
- To present developed Governance Entity Proposal to Ngati Whatua o Kaipara
- To seek feedback
Requirements for Governance Entity
- Any Governance Entity needs to be able to:
- Meet key leadership roles for Ngati Whatua o Kaipara
- Meet Crown requirements to receive settlement assets
- Undertake commercial activities
- Be accountable to South Kaipara claimants
Key Leadership Roles
- Oversight of Treaty negotiations after Agreement in Principle
- Receipt and management of assets received on settlement
- The ongoing governance of Ngati Whatua o Kaipara post settlement
- Distribution of benefits received by Ngati Whatua o Kaipara as a result of the Treaty claims
- Commercial negotiations (for example in relation to any future proposal for wind farms on the coast)
- Representing Ngati Whatua o Kaipara in discussions or negotiations with Government departments and/or local authorities as necessary
- Representing Ngati Whatua o Kaipara in discussions with other iwi and hapu
Crown Criteria
- Adequately represent and be fully accountable to all claimants within Ngati Whatua o Kaipara
- Have transparent decision-making and dispute resolution procedures
- Ensure the beneficiaries of the settlement and the beneficiaries of the governance entity are identical
- Be ratified by the claimant community
- Be efficient.
Key Considerations
- Simplicity
- Representation and Accountability
- Affordability
- Need to generate income
- Consistency with tikanga
Proposed Structure

Key Issues
- Structure
- Representation
- Definition of Ngati Whatua o Kaipara
Structure
General
- Separation of governance and operations
- Separation of assets and risk
- Most practical of structures available
- Used by other iwi
Double Trust
- Double trust structure proposed to keep the holding of wahi tapu separate from any commercial activities – safety mechanism
- The original proposal utilised a single trust with subsidiary companies.
General Features of Proposal
- Same trustees on both trusts.
- All Nga Uri o Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara (previously ‘beneficiaries’) over 18 can vote for trustees.
- Nga Uri o Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara therefore retain control of settlement through elected representatives.
- Decisions made by trustees, except where special resolution required (75% of Nga Uri required here).
Proposed Names
Trusts be named:
Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara Development Trust for the development (commercial and social) functions
-
- Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara Tari Pupuritaonga Trust to hold wahi tapu
Subsidiary Companies
Commercial
Ngati Whatua o Kaipara Commercial Development Limited
Commercial/trading arm.
-
- Borrow against assets of Nga Maunga o Whakahii o Kaipara Development Trust.
- Develop commercial ventures.
- No asset ownership.
Subsidiary Companies
Social
Ngati Whatua o Kaipara Social Development Limited
Social arm. Manage social needs (eg, contract social service delivery activities such as health and education).
-
- Apply funds received from Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara Development Trust to social purposes.
Not for profit.
Other Features
- Quorum at AGM and SGM = 25 adult Nga Uri o Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara (previously 30)
- Threshold for Special Resolution = 85% of adult Nga Uri o Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara (previously 75%)
Representation
Representation
Proposal is that ten elected representatives will be the trustees, apart from the first term where there will be:
five elected representatives; and
-
- five current members of the Claim Komiti
Trustees elected for the terms of four years, with the exception of the first term
Claim Komiti
- When GE established negotiations will be in progress.
- In order to maintain institutional memory, it is proposed that the claim komiti members whose mandate has been recognised by the Crown will serve as initial Trustees for a fixed term of two years.
- At expiry of the two-year term they will all be entitled to stand for re-election.
- Results in five trustees coming up for election every two years
Claimant Definition
Current Claimant Definition
- Ngati Whatua o Kaipara will be defined as Every individual who can trace Descent from one or more ancestors who exercised Customary Rights arising from Descent from:
- Haumoewaarangi; and/or
- The tribal groups of Ngati Whatua Tuturu, Te Taou, Ngati Rango, Ngati Hine and Te Uri o Hau; and
- Predominantly within the Area of Interest from 1840.
- Need for ongoing refinement of definition for AIP and Governance Entity
- Claimant Definition Wananga will be held to refine definition
Area of Interest
[GRAPHIC TO PLACE HERE]
Next Steps
Consultation on proposal:
- 17 August 2008 Orakei Marae24 August 2008 Araparera Marae
- 6 September 2008 Reweti Marae
- Incorporation of Feedback from consultation hui
- Finalise Proposal (September 2008)
- Hui to confirm key components (September/October 2008)
- Postal ballot to ratify proposal (November 2008)
- Establishment of governance entity (February 2009)
Feedback
Contact Grant Powell or Anthony Ruakere
Phone 09-377 7774
email grant@pwalawyers.co.nz or anthony@pwalawyers.co.nz