Consultation on Governance Entity Proposal

August 2008

G Powell/A E Hansen
Powell Webber & Associates
Solicitors, Auckland

Background

  • To date South Kaipara claims brought by the named claimants on behalf of the five Marae
  • In 2007 recognised need for an entity to be established to enable South Kaipara:
    • To conduct negotiations
    • To receive settlement assets
    • To investigate possible commercial opportunities
    • To reconfirm mandate to act on behalf of South Kaipara claimants
  • Terms of Negotiations with Crown require establishment of post-settlement governance entity by February 2009

Steps Undertaken to Date

  • Between June and August 2007 Claim Komiti undertook initial consultation on governance entity issues
  • Feedback sought from OTS
  • Claimant Feedback incorporated into developed proposal

What is the Process?

  • Claim Komiti developed Governance Entity Discussion Booklet
  • Presently consulting with Ngati Whatua o Kaipara
  • After feedback will finalise proposal and put to Ngati Whatua o Kaipara for ratification
  • If ratified will set up Governance Entity

Purpose of Consultation Hui

  • To present developed Governance Entity Proposal to Ngati Whatua o Kaipara
  • To seek feedback

Requirements for Governance Entity

  • Any Governance Entity needs to be able to:
  • Meet key leadership roles for Ngati Whatua o Kaipara
  • Meet Crown requirements to receive settlement assets
  • Undertake commercial activities
  • Be accountable to South Kaipara claimants

Key Leadership Roles

  • Oversight of Treaty negotiations after Agreement in Principle
  • Receipt and management of assets received on settlement
  • The ongoing governance of Ngati Whatua o Kaipara post settlement
  • Distribution of benefits received by Ngati Whatua o Kaipara as a result of the Treaty claims
  • Commercial negotiations (for example in relation to any future proposal for wind farms on the coast)
  • Representing Ngati Whatua o Kaipara in discussions or negotiations with Government departments and/or local authorities as necessary
  • Representing Ngati Whatua o Kaipara in discussions with other iwi and hapu

Crown Criteria

  • Adequately represent and be fully accountable to all claimants within Ngati Whatua o Kaipara
  • Have transparent decision-making and dispute resolution procedures
  • Ensure the beneficiaries of the settlement and the beneficiaries of the governance entity are identical
  • Be ratified by the claimant community
  • Be efficient.

Key Considerations

  • Simplicity
  • Representation and Accountability
  • Affordability
  • Need to generate income
  • Consistency with tikanga

Proposed Structure

Proposed Structure

Key Issues

  • Structure
  • Representation
  • Definition of Ngati Whatua o Kaipara

Structure

General

  • Separation of governance and operations
  • Separation of assets and risk
  • Most practical of structures available
  • Used by other iwi

Double Trust

  • Double trust structure proposed to keep the holding of wahi tapu separate from any commercial activities – safety mechanism
  • The original proposal utilised a single trust with subsidiary companies.

General Features of Proposal

  • Same trustees on both trusts.
  • All Nga Uri o Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara (previously ‘beneficiaries’) over 18 can vote for trustees.
    • Nga Uri o Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara therefore retain control of settlement through elected representatives.
  • Decisions made by trustees, except where special resolution required (75% of Nga Uri required here).

Proposed Names

Trusts be named:

Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara Development Trust for the development (commercial and social) functions

    • Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara Tari Pupuritaonga Trust to hold wahi tapu
Subsidiary Companies
Commercial

Ngati Whatua o Kaipara Commercial Development Limited

Commercial/trading arm.

    • Borrow against assets of Nga Maunga o Whakahii o Kaipara Development Trust.
  • Develop commercial ventures.
  • No asset ownership.
Subsidiary Companies
Social

Ngati Whatua o Kaipara Social Development Limited

Social arm. Manage social needs (eg, contract social service delivery activities such as health and education).

    • Apply funds received from Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara Development Trust to social purposes.

Not for profit.

Other Features

  • Quorum at AGM and SGM = 25 adult Nga Uri o Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara (previously 30)
  • Threshold for Special Resolution = 85% of adult Nga Uri o Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara (previously 75%)

Representation

Representation

 

Proposal is that ten elected representatives will be the trustees, apart from the first term where there will be:

five elected representatives; and

    • five current members of the Claim Komiti

Trustees elected for the terms of four years, with the exception of the first term

Claim Komiti

  • When GE established negotiations will be in progress.
  • In order to maintain institutional memory, it is proposed that the claim komiti members whose mandate has been recognised by the Crown will serve as initial Trustees for a fixed term of two years.
  • At expiry of the two-year term they will all be entitled to stand for re-election.
  • Results in five trustees coming up for election every two years

Claimant Definition

Current Claimant Definition

  • Ngati Whatua o Kaipara will be defined as Every individual who can trace Descent from one or more ancestors who exercised Customary Rights arising from Descent from:
    • Haumoewaarangi; and/or
    • The tribal groups of Ngati Whatua Tuturu, Te Taou, Ngati Rango, Ngati Hine and Te Uri o Hau; and
    • Predominantly within the Area of Interest from 1840.
  • Need for ongoing refinement of definition for AIP and Governance Entity
  • Claimant Definition Wananga will be held to refine definition

Area of Interest

[GRAPHIC TO PLACE HERE]

Next Steps

Consultation on proposal:

  • 17 August 2008 Orakei Marae24 August 2008 Araparera Marae
  • 6 September 2008 Reweti Marae
  • Incorporation of Feedback from consultation hui
  • Finalise Proposal (September 2008)
  • Hui to confirm key components (September/October 2008)
  • Postal ballot to ratify proposal (November 2008)
  • Establishment of governance entity (February 2009)

Feedback

Contact Grant Powell or Anthony Ruakere

Phone 09-377 7774

email grant@pwalawyers.co.nz or anthony@pwalawyers.co.nz